The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) J 947^{^{^{(c) (m)}}} 19:07, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Bernie Sanders presidential campaign endorsements, 2016[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are multiple problems with this page. Much of it is sourced to people's personal Twitter accounts. Regardless of the sourcing, these endorsements generally aren't relevant to anything. And the entire page comes off as promotional. KingForPA (talk) 15:35, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:33, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:33, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:33, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This directly conflicts with your arguments to keep List of Hillary Clinton presidential campaign non-political endorsements, 2016 as made at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Hillary Clinton presidential campaign non-political endorsements, 2016. I will be back later to justify a vote for Keep.Mpen320 (talk) 22:17, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There is value in endorsement pages as I have reiterated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Hillary Clinton presidential campaign non-political endorsements, 2016.Mpen320 (talk) 01:26, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep point 2, a and b, "obviously frivolous or vexatious" and "disruptive", respectively. Deletion nominator's account was created yesterday, article tagged literally 1 minute later, deletion discussion created 2 minutes after that (logs). This is tit-for-tat regarding the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Hillary Clinton presidential campaign non-political endorsements, 2016 nomination. TheValeyard (talk) 04:35, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. If anything, this is even more worth saving than the Clinton endorsement article, because it shows where the lines were drawn in the party primary contest, and provides context for the mood during that preliminary chapter.--Sunshineisles2 (talk) 03:51, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.