The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 01:40, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of Billboard Hot 100 number-two singles of 2015[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I wouldn't think a list of number-two singles would be notable. Frietjes (talk) 00:00, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Infinitely recursive series. Ignoring the "We're #2! We're #2!" jokes, the next would be a "List of #3 singles," then "#4 singles," ad infinitum (well, to 200). This is a distinction without significance (no reason for this slicing of the pie). Hithladaeus (talk) 12:48, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per Hithladaeus. Rmosler | ● 22:48, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Should be deleted for the same reasons List of Hot 100 number-two singles of 2008 (U.S.) was. G4 should apply here since this simply a continuation of the previously deleted articles. Would we have to go through a full AfD again if someone creates the number twos of 2016 next year? --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 09:12, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Wikipedia is not a indiscriminate collection of information. The list fails WP:LISTN. Esquivalience ^t 23:27, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and possible G4. Fails any notability. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 14:02, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dump per nom. --Richhoncho (talk) 20:19, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I noticed that the creator of this list, Coxmason88, also created List of Billboard Hot 100 number-two singles of 2000. I'm WP:BOLDly adding it to the nomination because if this one gets deleted, that one should too. I checked and these two seem to be the only years that exist. Tavix | Talk 22:11, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clealy fails WP:LISTN and WP:IINFO. That's what this article is.--Clean-up-wiki-guy (talk) 00:50, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a highly WP:INDISCRIMINATE list. Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:07, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Delete per everyone above - IMHO "Number 1 singles" are fine but "Number 2s" are pretty pointless, Anyway Fails LISTN. –Davey2010^Talk 18:44, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly non-notable per everyone above. BenLinus 1214^talk 22:16, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.