The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 22:29, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of CPU power dissipation figures[edit]

List of CPU power dissipation figures (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Primarily, I start deletion discussion according to WP:NOTCATALOG, in addition to quality concerns including extensive presence of original research, as well as verifiability concerns for the more than 1300 processors listed. XrayBravoGolf (talk) 18:37, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 December 11. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:58, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. XrayBravoGolf (talk) 19:01, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:51, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOTCATALOGUE and WP:NOTIINFO. A huge collection of non-notable tech-cruft. Ajf773 (talk) 08:16, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not notable. Data is not from WP:RS. Constant314 (talk) 11:58, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep or merge. Well, several years ago (2007 ?), there was an article that listed the available low power consuming CPUs. That was very informative, but it is gone. That days the high power CPUs were popular. Environment protection was unpopular. There ought to be a discussion in the "Articles for deletion" archive, but I can't find it. -- Well, according to this article, it's more easy. This "List of CPU power dissipation figures" was at first part of the article CPU electrical consumption that moved to CPU power dissipation (21 November 2005). After a few years it was moved to Processor power dissipation (6 March 2009‎). In the same year the list section was seperated from the "Processor power dissipation" article to List of CPU power dissipation (15 November 2009‎). After a few years the list was moved to it's current lemma List of CPU power dissipation figures (14 August 2012‎). -- I think the relevance is proven. That's why I think it should be kept or merged back to the lemma "Processor power dissipation", where the list came from. -- Temdor (talk) 01:49, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.