The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 19:05, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Call of Duty mods[edit]

List of Call of Duty mods (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indiscriminate information, WP:NOT a repository of links or a web directory, 8 mods, only one of which is notable (and has it's own article anyway.) The Kinslayer 09:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. The Kinslayer 09:21, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. List of a lot of external links. Mods aren't notable from the one with an article. You can't put one article in a list. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:08, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wikipedia is not a web directory. James086^{Talk | Contribs} 12:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. MER-C 13:07, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Mgm. Mods are generally not notable, a perennial problem for those who seek to include them. Somewhere else, please. Guy (Help!) 14:27, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge back into the Call of Duty article section on Mods any information not already there. -- Upholder 16:38, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. ← ANAS ^Talk? 16:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. The notable mods can have their own articles, but the list of non-notable mods shouldn't warrant a separate article. --Alan Au 17:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and comments above. Sigh. WJBscribe 20:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete a lot of mod articles have come up for deletion recently, so this may have been an attempt to sidestep that by listifying them. In any case, virtually no information, more like a list of external links, and we all know WP:NOT a web directory. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:48, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge, per Upholder. Comment: Seems people are getting over zealous with AFD nominations, finally pushed me into getting involved after an article I wrote was nominated and butchered. Join the counter offensive by replying to the WP:CVG/D AFD debates. --MegaBurn 21:09, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Keep or Merge Highly notable game, and with notable modding community. Bfelite 20:41, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • 8 mods is not 'notable'. The Kinslayer 21:27, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Its a reasonable point, perhaps merge is better option. Bfelite 23:12, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Mgm. NeoJustin 22:19, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Non-notable mods, significant mods can be mentioned on Call of Duty article. --Scottie theNerd 04:58, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as nom. Half Life list as been deleted recently and if one list is not good enought to be here and gets deleted not because of being Half-Life but for being a list then following the same logic all similar lists should be also deleted. Snewerl 14:42, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: As Half-Life has one of the most extensive mod lists, if that list is deleted, others like it should definitely go too. --Scottie theNerd 17:02, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per MER-C Nashville Monkey 09:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.