The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 17:25, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Chicago Fire broadcasters[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tables of (mostly) red links, with almost no context do not make a useful article. Even if these issues were addressed, I cannot see how the article benefits Wikipedia. Bazonka (talk) 21:24, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Chicago Fire Soccer Club. Information would be more useful there. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 21:58, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 07:16, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. What do you want to merge here? This is irrelevant Trivia at its best. It's unsourced too. And polish commentators have what relevant connection to the club? I'd say none. -Koppapa (talk) 07:31, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Broadcasters are relevant because they are part of the team's history. The polish commentators are particularly relevant because the Fire were the only professional sports team in the U.S. to broadcast their games in Polish. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 21:27, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unsourced trivia. Giant Snowman 16:26, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Hirolovesswords (talk) 03:52, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Although the author has improved the article it's still Listcruft & of little/no benefit. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 01:09, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.