The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:41, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
List article that consists of a whole series of a non-notable podcast. E. Fokker (talk) 21:43, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep valid subarticle of day9 which got a notable (WP:GNG award --212.45.116.90 (talk) 10:53, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is the third time E. Fokker has tried to deleted this article.
The first time was under Speedy Deletion C7. From CSD A7: This criterion applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people, organizations, and individual animals themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software, or other creative works. Since a podcast is a creative work, I do not feel this criterion applies.
The second time the review for deletion resulted in a keep. I feel the continued attempt to remove this article is due to the lack of knowledge on the importance of a player based community for a game that has been an major contributing factor for Blizzard Entertainment's economic and future game development growth since 1998. Please review the Cultural Impact section of StarCraft Franchise. I would recommend E. Fokker and other whose weild the power of deletion to become more familiar with the subjects they are recommending, prior to taking "aim" at an article they do not feel is worthy of the world to have access too.
This is a valid split per WP:SPLIT.If an article becomes too large or a section of an article has a length that is out of proportion to the rest of the article it is recommended that a split be carried out. In some cases refactoring an article into child or sister articles can allow subtopics to be discussed more fully elsewhere without dominating a general overview article to which they are non-central (but only if the new articles are themselves sufficiently notable to be included in the encyclopedia. Because the main article will be too long if all his dailys were put on the day9 article splitting that part of the article out is a good idea --212.45.116.90 (talk) 05:11, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]