The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 11:57, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Deceased YouTubers[edit]

List of Deceased YouTubers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Indiscriminate and largely unsourced list of people with YouTube channels who have died. Trivialist (talk) 03:23, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Five sources in the article out of 100-ish entries; WP:BLP isn't even the tip of the iceberg here, and this is just asking to be as bad as List of burn centers in the United States was before it was locked down to lock out drive-by jokes. Also the writing is incredibly poor and the "After their deaths" section is gaudy as heck to have in this type of article. Nate • (chatter) 04:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:47, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:55, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE. Also the horde of external links just directs to a Youtube channel, pretty much every list entry fails WP:BLP.Ajf773 (talk) 06:43, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Yup, that's WP:LINKFARM and an WP:ADVERT. Make that four policy violations here. Nate • (chatter) 07:51, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete certainly just because you have a Youtube account, does not make you notable. Also few references. Deathlibrarian (talk) 07:13, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I know that of course, Wikipedia isn't a platform for memorials, and that this doesn't gel with Wikipedia policy. However, looking at this list, I can sympathise with the poster in that the page acts as a tribute to these unfortunate people. Deathlibrarian (talk) 07:18, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE and for lack of proper sources. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 09:33, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:45, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Pure LINKFARM and not reliably sourced failing our basic standards. KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 11:51, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not notable, subjective and trivial. WP:Memorial and WP:LINKFARM applies. Kierzek (talk) 17:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.