The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:01, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, seems pointless to me.++aviper2k7++ 21:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Week Keep Appears to violate WP:NOT but a similar debate is going on here: Talk:List of DirecTV channels. Static Universe 07:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Shameless DirectTV promotional article, violates WP:NOT. Are we going to start creating channel line ups for every local cable company in the world? Alan.ca 07:07, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As well, the article does not meet the criteria of wp:v.Alan.ca 18:42, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep There is no debate on whether the reular Talk:List of DirecTV channels
Delete. I was goinng to suggest merger but the relevant general information is already included in the DirecTV article. Listing each specific locality's lineup of channels is unencylopedic. JamesMLanetc 11:42, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete very useless. --Caldorwards4 06:08, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. WMMartin 18:08, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.