The result was Delete as listcruft. (aeropagitica) 22:20, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As to whether the scope of the list is too narrow or too broad (Wikipedia:Lists (stand-alone lists)#Appropriate_topics_for_lists): This list is not a set complement, its criteria being inclusive ("everything with property X") rather than exclusive; and it is not, contrary to what it is stated above by TrackerTV, infinite, since the total number of songs in the world is finite. Wwwwolf's problems with the article lie in whether neologisms constitute nonsense, and are addressed by sidestepping the problem entirely and relying upon sources that have already done the work, such as those previously mentioned, rather than original research by Wikipedia editors that then has to be argued about. Quite a lot of the article can be retained even if all of the entries that cannot currently be sourced are removed, and the sources contain much that isn't already in the article. Maintaining the list is a matter of finding, citing, and using additional sources. Keep. Uncle G 15:24, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]