The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep Kotniski (talk) 09:05, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A notable list. Covered in many sources. --Bejnar (talk) 06:56, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Per above. Why was this listed? No reason given. Outback the koala (talk) 07:04, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because I'm not seeing any rationale for deleting this (either in the nomination, or a look at the article). Bradjamesbrown (talk) 07:25, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep No doubt a notable list. -- XETELI(HELLO • FOOTAGE) 08:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.