The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 22:01, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:GNG and is pure listcruft. U20 football is not usually notable JMHamo (talk) 13:38, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 13:40, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable. GiantSnowman 13:48, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteWP:LISTCRUFT, and non-senior football is generally non-notable. — Jkudlicktcs 23:54, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No indication that the notion of hat tricks at the U20 WC has achieved any significant level of coverage as a subject itself. this is just pure WP:NOTSTATS. Fenix down (talk) 12:01, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.