- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:06, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
List of Formula One pole positions by Lewis Hamilton[edit]
- List of Formula One pole positions by Lewis Hamilton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:LISTN and at odds with WP:DUP and WP:CFORK. Tvx1 17:35, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm also nomination the following articles for the same reasons:
- List of Formula One pole positions by Michael Schumacher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- List of Formula One pole positions by Ayrton Senna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- List of Formula One pole positions by Sebastian Vettel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Tvx1 17:35, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:28, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- DELETE; per nomination. --Falcadore (talk) 23:45, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all – Needless fork of the results tables already provided in the main articles. Wikipedia is not a statistical database, and these are entirely redundant. They completely fail NLIST, which states that
a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources
, and there is no evidence on any of these articles that such coverage exists. Even a cursory check for each of these will show that virtually the only time they are considered as a set is by statistics databases. 5225C (talk • contributions) 02:22, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- delete per above. Pelmeen10 (talk) 09:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per nom and others. Needless statscruft and lists do not meet WP:LISTN. Ajf773 (talk) 09:28, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: all. Fails WP:NLIST and is therefore also a violation of WP:NOSTATS SSSB (talk) 18:56, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per the above. Doesn't provide any encyclopedic content, just data. A7V2 (talk) 23:27, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all as unnecessary WP:CFORKs. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:17, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.