The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 16:33, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of Kenyan football transfers end of 2012[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not a notable domestic leagues. This article is unnecessary, so it should be deleted speedy. Almost links are red. Banhtrung1 (talk) 14:16, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I disagree with lists of non-notable people, they serve no real purpose. Giant Snowman 10:41, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - lists of football transfers are generally regarded as notable per WP:LISTN, because reliable sources tend to discuss this as a group. Mentoz86 (talk) 18:48, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I disagree with you there Mentoz, LISTN only indicates notability if the list has been discussed at length in independant reliable sources "as a group". I don't see any indication that football transfers in Kenya in 2012 has received anywhere near the required level of coverage as an overall subject. Given the list is also full of non-notable / redlinked players, it is hard to see how this list could serve even the most basic of navigational purposes either. Fenix down (talk) 13:32, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 16:10, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.