- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith! Missvain (talk) 16:15, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
List of Latin names of mountains[edit]
- List of Latin names of mountains (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Simple translation list. Fails WP:LISTN. There's also some possible WP:OR in the list, as some of the entries are marked with "?". See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Latin names of lakes. Hog Farm (talk) 19:22, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 19:22, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 19:22, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete About time for a bulk AFD. Wikipedia is not a WP:DICTIONARY, especially when half of these are the same as they're known in English... Reywas92Talk 19:37, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:45, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete “Wikipedia is not a dictionary” is a clear policy, and this entire list was literally copied straight out of a dictionary.--Pontificalibus 22:09, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Per above, Wikipedia is not a dictionary,WP:DICTIONARY Alex-h (talk) 14:22, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as redundant. Our readers know where to find it on Google. Bearian (talk) 17:03, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.