The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 01:55, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Leicester City F.C. individual awards[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. Is it too late to bundle this in to List of Arsenal F.C. individual awards AfD? JMHamo (talk) 13:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 13:10, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 15:51, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 15:52, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 15:52, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete These can all be inserted into individuals' and club season articles. This list exists solely to exist. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 16:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. The kind of nerds who are interested in this kind of thing will happily dig through all the player articles and season articles to find them and probably have nothing better to do with their time. Siuenti (talk) 17:19, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete As per nomination and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Arsenal F.C. individual awards Coderzombie (talk) 20:25, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: also ~~speedy~~ delete List of New York Islanders award winners Siuenti (talk) 21:31, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Siuenti: Was that a bad joke? JMHamo (talk) 21:58, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It would be silly to delete this one and the Arsenal one but keep that. Siuenti (talk) 22:09, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's a Featured List, this is definitely not. JMHamo (talk) 22:12, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK so delete it slowly. But be consistent. Siuenti (talk) 22:43, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, you are showing a lack of understanding about Wikipedia. JMHamo (talk) 22:45, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Siuenti, I don't see any "inconsistency" here. At best, the article you point out is similar to List of Arsenal F.C. records and statistics. Coderzombie (talk) 22:57, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For example it has an "individual awards section. Don't you feel the urge to rush over there and delete it, because the information there can be inserted into individuals' and club season articles. Surely it violate WP:NOTSTATS just the way this list does. There is existing consensus not to have this kind of information on Wikipedia. Siuenti (talk) 08:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per existing consensus. Giant Snowman 07:16, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Could be a notable subject if we were talking the same level of awards as noted in the featured list above. Whereas that list focuses on Hall of Fame entrants, and national awards for players at the peak of their game, this list focuses on lower division player of the month awards and other such minor trophies. If you strip out the few awards won by players for their title winning season recently, there is very little of note that requires a standalone list. Fenix down (talk) 14:58, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Arsenal F.C. individual awards. No reason the information can't simply be included in the player/manager articles. Kosack (talk) 16:46, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I fail to see how Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Arsenal F.C. individual awards sets a precedent, but List of New York Islanders award winners does not. Sure, the monthly awards are ridiculous, but that is a matter of article scope - they could easily be removed. On the other hand, having been accepted as a FL certainly does not make a subject notable. Anyway, I have asked the closer of the Arsenal AfD to review the early close, given the importance of the discussion. I am reserving my !vote here until that issue is resolved. (It's also hard to see how the Arsenal article created a precedent without having seen it - it might have been completely different to this one.) St Anselm (talk) 00:20, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: already deleted one, what's the point of keeping others?¬¬¬¬ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yuuuu1000 (talk • contribs) 20:24, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I am surprised to see why people dont see a point Siuenti made about List of New York Islanders award winners. I know some will try and teach me about "other stuff exists", but hey, we cannot have double standards. What is sauce for the goose, is sauce for the gander. I think Wikipedia should be run by rules and not by exceptions. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 03:35, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.