The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Modussiccandi (talk) 16:21, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Made In Baltics artists[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although sourced I don't see how this really helps outside of the Made in Baltics article. This is just another version of a category, suggest merging what content is needed and deleting this article. Govvy (talk) 12:59, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:02, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NOTDUP. Sources included are valuable to the encyclopedia, which a category does not provide. Most major labels have a similar artist list (see Category:Lists of recording artists by label). Qwaiiplayer (talk) 14:24, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The rules clearly state you can not delete a list article because you prefer it as a category. Dream Focus 15:32, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is a new label, founded in 2018, hence there is no length-of-article argument to justify splitting off separate discography and artists lists. The sources establish that the singles were released, and by the label; hence within the Made in Baltics article, these sources would potentially assist in establishing notability for the label. But it isn't a major label, in fact that article is very poorly sourced, with notability dependent, so far as I can see, on one group and one referenced award (other awards are listed but not sourced; if either sources for them or extended articles on the label itself exist, the situation may change, but a series of editors have judged the article as not making an adequate case for notability). In particular, there are not many artists in this list; it would fit very easily in a paragraph within the article on the label. (I also don't see any evidence of independently notable singles at List of Made In Baltics singles; have any done especially well in charts?) So that argument for having a list—many notable items—doesn't appear to obtain either. I think this should be a list within the label article, benefiting that article with its sources as well as its content, and with the title recreated as a redirect for those who search on it, and I would support doing the same for the longer discography article, too. At least until it does qualify as a major label, with both sections getting awfully long and with a lot written about what the label has contributed to music and to its artists' careers. Yngvadottir (talk) 03:46, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The artists page should be added into the main Made in Baltics article. Gusfriend (talk) 09:02, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A standalone list from the parent article Made in Baltics is not warranted. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:45, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.