The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, noting also that we do not usually merge content and then delete the page as the history needs to be retained for attribution purposes. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Miss World runners-up and finalists[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contentfork of the year-articles. No need for a separate article. Fancruft. The Banner talk 23:05, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 00:03, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. However, if List of Miss World titleholders cannot fulfill its duties, this list can take its place. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:54, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge the content to the List of Miss World titleholders then Delete.--Richie Campbell (talk) 03:31, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not notable. The pageant company does not even publish such a list so it's hard to verify OR for us to publish this fancruft. The first comment is pretty funny Legacypac (talk) 11:39, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.