The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 01:43, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of UEFA club competition winners[edit]

This list covers only a part of the UEFA competition records and furthermore that part is much better covered in that article. There is no need for this list. Nergaal (talk) 17:45, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. —Cliff smith ^talk 23:57, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. —Cliff smith ^talk 00:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This list elaborates on the list of winners section, covered in the UEFA competition records article, it is my belief that the table of winners in the competition records list should be removed an a link placed to direct to the list in question. That article focuses on more than one subject, and does cover as much ground as the winners list does. The list is also the parent rticle in a planned featured topic containing the winners of UEFA club competitions, so deleting it would put that in jeopardy. Also the record article should be structured to a list like this, to improve the article's reliability and to keep it in line with the policy on record articles at WP:FOOTY. The list in question follows the principle set here, which is a featured topic, and therefore I feel it should be kept as ultimately a featured topic would come out of this. NapHit (talk) 18:05, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - rather pointless adding up of various competitions, making the Intertoto Cup and Super Cup seem equal to the European Cup/Champions League etc., and ignoring the Fairs Cup just because some sources indicate it wasn't a UEFA competition before the renaming. - fchd (talk) 18:42, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is not pointless, especially when there is a similar list for managers, I'm only going by what the UEFA website states are their club competitions, which includes the Intertoto Cup and Super Cup. NapHit (talk) 18:59, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"making the Intertoto Cup and Super Cup seem equal..." Hey, you've just made an argument to delete about 90% of lists on this site! I suppose a list of poisonous insects (I don't know whether or not that even exists) should preemptively be deleted because it makes it seem like all insects are equally poisonous! What about list of football clubs in Italy (which I know exists) - evidently Serie D and Serie A clubs are on equal footing too. ugen64 (talk) 02:38, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a summary article for List of UEFA Cup winners, List of UEFA Cup Winners' Cup winners, List of European Cup and UEFA Champions League winners, List of UEFA Intertoto Cup winners and List of UEFA Super Cup winners. – Pee Jay 19:36, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - discriminate, organised, useful. TerriersFan (talk) 00:45, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into UEFA. The tables are useful, no more or less so than the World Cup table. That said, hardly anything links here and it isn't a common search term. BeL1EveR (talk) 04:56, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree with the nominator, the information in this article is basically a repeat of that already on UEFA competition records minus a few details. An unecessary article. Bettia (rawr CRUSH!) 08:29, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. UEFA competition records is a summary article of this and several other pages, whilst this is a summary article of the articles that PeeJay lists. I see no reason why this can't be expanded and even become featured along the lines of the managerial equivalent. Does not fail any of the reasons outlined on WP:LC. Improving this article would be much preferable to deleting it. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 18:29, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.