The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 18:48, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
In a consensus here it was decided that, in order to avovid large numbers of list of launches article with little to no value, a list of launches had to have 10 completed launches or be otherwise very significant. This rocket has 0 completed launches and is not even currently operational. Franklly, there is a reasonable possibilty of it being cancelled alltogether. In the absence of proof that this is necessary, this is essentially a POVFORK. I think this article is useless at least at the moment (until this rocket actually starts flying). Next, a there is little confirmed information here. Every date is basically a guesstimate. All dates are in the format of Season Year or Quarter Year at best and just Year or TBD at worst. Finally, the article contradicts itself and is clearly missing information (ex. It says 53 launches are listed below and then proceeds to list only 13 of them) The reason why this article doesn't have all of the information is because there is little to none to go on. The entire article only has 14 references, many of which are not even in the list itself.