The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Krimpet 07:02, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of atheists who support evolutionary theory[edit]

List of atheists who support evolutionary theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

A pointless list created solely to push the creators POV, that evolution is part of some atheist agenda. ornis (t) 03:18, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This article seems devoid of context, with only one autobiography as a reference. I fail to see the need for such an article, personally. ^Ariel♥Gold 03:29, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is like a list of atheists that believe in the Big Bang. It is pointless POV pushing. Jmm6f488 03:46, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:OR and pov pushing. --Evb-wiki 04:19, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Entirely pointless. An article on Atheists who don't believe in evolution would be interesting though. Nick mallory 04:32, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Trivial intersection Corpx 05:11, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Absolutely pointless (or inane, or dumb - everyone already said "pointless"...) First of all, the distinction between atheist and agnostic is all but impossible as there is no generally accepted definition of either. Next, why divide the listed people into agnostics and atheists when to all intents and purposes they represent the same mentality. Finally, atheists accept evolution as a matter of course - if they didn't, they wouldn't be atheists. An article like this is as dumb as a List of Christians who believe Jesus resurrected would be. Delete and salt this article asap, for Chrissakes! Er, I mean for the sake of science! --Targeman 05:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - List has no value as an information resource. I don't pretend to know the article creator's inner thoughts in creating this article, but the apparent purpose of the article is to suggest that evolution is some sort of atheist agenda. --orlady 05:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, topic is too specific, list is too short, devoid of context. Seems like this was only created to push a POV. JIP | Talk 05:54, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.