The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Total Annihilation. MBisanz ^talk 13:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of awards received by Total Annihilation[edit]

List of awards received by Total Annihilation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

It is wonderful that it has won so many awards but i don't think this deserves another articles. Iam not sure which policy it violates but there are so many games that won so many awards but does not have an article. SkyWalker (talk) 07:57, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. SkyWalker (talk) 08:02, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into Total Annihilation. Awards won by a game, even a game as notable as this, does not warrant require its own article. Rilak (talk) 10:18, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - The parent article should include a section describing the awards from the more notable publications (which it does already), and a bit of prose about what they had to say (which it doesn't). This article is both largely unreferenced and indiscriminate, so should be simply deleted without merging. Marasmusine (talk) 10:42, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The parent article only mentions Gamespot and Gamespy. However, the world does not revolve around Gamespot or Gamespy. To sufficiently demonstrate how Total Annihilation is recognized internationally, I think it is necessary to mention awards won by any notable publication. The content is unsourced now, but it is no reason for deletion as it could be easily verified. Rilak (talk) 05:23, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, expand the critical reception section to mention awards given by the most notable paper and online magazines. We don't need to go into accolades given by borderline notable-publications, or self-published websites (Game Briefs, for example.) Marasmusine (talk) 12:01, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:20, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:20, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Smerge to Total Annihilation per Rilak. Stifle (talk) 14:24, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into Total Annihilation. There's reliable third-party sources for this, but keeping it separate from the main article prevents it from having a comprehensive "reception" section, which is required to balance out WP:PLOT and one day be considered a good article. Randomran (talk) 17:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.