The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is that this list is unsuitable as a topic for Wikipedia at this time. Mz7 (talk) 20:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of carbon accounting software[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List of almost entirely non-notable software products, per WP:STAND, the only sensible option here is delete. Waggie (talk) 18:42, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:NOTCATALOG, WP:NOTLINKFARM. Fails WP:LISTN. Ajf773 (talk) 20:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Layzner (Talk) 18:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as clear advertising alone. SwisterTwister talk 21:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Some of the linked pages like FirstCarbon Solutions were deleted multiple times. I would also recommend deleting Access Dimensions. Ziphit (talk) 20:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails.promocional articleCAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:39, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.