The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♠ 08:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of current Indian Super League players with national team caps[edit]

List of current Indian Super League players with national team caps (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Please refer to WP:LISTCRUFT #3, #6, #11, #12; there is little to no prose nor is there any explanation as to why the topic is notable. Lists still need to meet notability criteria. Please also see WP:LISTN. Spiderone 10:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:36, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:36, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:36, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:36, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:36, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 10:36, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:37, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Why is it not listcruft? Spiderone 22:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 10:51, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.