The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 14:33, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of earthquakes in 2017[edit]

List of earthquakes in 2017 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is currently a copy of List of earthquakes in 2016 and should only appear in article space next year with current data. Devopam (talk) 07:21, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:21, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:21, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. This will become a valid article in one month, so WP:TOOSOON shouldn't apply this close to 2017. We should avoid any confusion with previous years however and clear out all other data. Ajf773 (talk) 17:28, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Lists of earthquakes for now. There could be no earthquakes in 2017. Unless there's some mover & shaker who can expand this now... Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 18:27, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Why get rid of a useful skeleton and make someone do it over again? That's rule-following in defiance of sense. DGG ( talk ) 06:03, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Not a reason for TOOSOONness, but in one month it will become a valid article. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 07:38, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep --Stanqo (talk) 12:07, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.