The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW (non-admin closure) --MPerel 23:33, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of environmental periodicals[edit]

List of environmental periodicals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Categories serve the purpose of this page, unecyclopaedic. There is a Category:Environmental magazines that suits many of the entries. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 07:29, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Useful list. No red links. Looks fine to me. Johnfos (talk) 08:47, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Of course this list needs to be improved ( a lead, a description of its scope), but it is no doubt interesting, useful, notable and encyclopedic. Eklipse (talk) 13:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:20, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Could be a useful page to many users. People who don't know that much about Wikipedia and are just looking something up may not know to look at a Category page. Besides, the list on the category page is a lot shorter than the one on this page. --Bobianite (talk) 01:39, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply It would be easy to add the missing article on the list to the category: -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 04:27, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep This list is useful for people who want to access environmentl periodicals. Artene50 (talk) 01:40, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Pr WP:CLS the existence of a category should not preclude a list. Taemyr (talk) 04:50, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply But WP:NOT#DIRECTORY. This list has no annotation and is simply andalphabetical list with no sorting of any kind. A category does the same thing. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 04:27, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.