The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 19:36, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of farms in Cornwall[edit]

List of farms in Cornwall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same reasoning as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of farms in Gausdal, with the exception that this list does not seem to have a goal of being comprehensive. The topic of this list would be better served by a category. Geschichte (talk) 19:28, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Perfectly valid list, no grounds for deletion given. WP:NOTDIRECTORY does not apply to lists of Wikipedia articles. Lists and categories can co-exist. ----Pontificalibus 19:49, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:39, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:39, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:39, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – Qualifies for an article per WP:NOTDUP, relative to Category:Farms in Cornwall, and the article consists almost entirely of blue links, except for one entry. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:40, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. I understand the rationale to keep as a navigational list, but the vast majority of the entries are one-line stubs. WP:NPLACE (which just mentions common outcomes and isn't even a guideline per se) is silent on farms specifically, and I'm somewhat skeptical on notability of these (for the most part; there might be some exceptions). Maybe there's a better solution here? –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:18, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Most of these farms will have a long history and would have been settlements (e.g. Carnebone), passing WP:GEOLAND. Trevowhan for example was a hamlet. These articles need expansion not merging or deletion. ----Pontificalibus 15:32, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Easily passes WP:LISTN as a navigational list. The fact they're stubs matters not. SportingFlyer T·C 14:01, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I presume the deletion nominator is unaware of wp:CLNT. Please do go read it. Come back and ask questions about it if there's any part of it which you don't understand. --Doncram (talk) 22:35, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.