The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – sgeureka ^t•c 13:40, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of fictional books from non-print media[edit]

List of fictional books from non-print media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sometimes The Simpsons makes a visual gag by showing Lisa or another character reading a book with a funny name. It's onscreen for about three seconds and has no bearing on the episode's plot. This show alone is 17% of this page's swath of WP:INDISCRIMINATE, non-notable, context-free, unimportant passing mentions that fails WP:SALAT. Reywas92^Talk 09:33, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Reywas92^Talk 09:33, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Pretty much what the nominator says, WP:NOTIINFO and WP:FANCRUFT. Ajf773 (talk) 09:47, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:56, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Massive, WP:INDISCRIMINATE data dump without any context or notability. WP:TNT delete._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 17:55, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Textbook definition of WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Hog Farm (talk) 19:26, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:SNOW flurries. I've also nominated its periodical counterpart. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:34, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete An indiscriminate list of non-entitites. Some of these are so minor within a plot they can be totally missed by many viewers. For what it is worth this is also a non-complete list.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:16, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nomination.TH1980 (talk) 04:23, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.