The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. JForget 00:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
List of redlinks (only blue link is incorrectly targeted), with no notability asserted and no references. Jameboy (talk) 18:09, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is a plausible list as this is a top-level national football league. This is just one of many such lists (see Category:Lists of football (soccer) clubs) and, although this won't be a massive list, there's no reason why this couldn't be tidied up to a half decent standard. Bettia(talk) 22:21, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Bettia(talk) 22:23, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Defined list of a notable topic. Redlinks do not equal non-notable. Lugnuts (talk) 06:45, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree that this would need to be tidied up even to reach the standard of "half decent". At the moment, it's a pretty mediocre page. If someone would be willing to write an article about soccer in American Samoa (which, by the way, is not a nation), and make a list as part of that article, that would be fine, but this doesn't really add to the sum of human knowledge. Mandsford (talk) 12:49, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment American Soma is a nation, at least according to FIFA. They're ranked joint 203rd and last in the FIFA rankings. Lugnuts (talk) 15:01, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In the same sense that Puerto Rico is a nation, I suppose. It would be possible for someone to rely upon the FIFA and the RSSSF sources to make it something more than a slapdash list. Mandsford (talk) 17:41, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per Lugnuts. Additionally, Mandsford, poor quality is not a reason for deletion, just for improvement. matt91486 (talk) 01:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, defined list as part of a set of lists per Category:Lists of football (soccer) clubs, systemic bias says keep this list. If it is good enough to have a list of a clubs in a country ranked 202, it should be good enough for a country ranked 203.--ClubOranjeT 09:06, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Needs refs, but notability is given. Nageh (talk) 08:46, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.