The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:28, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of football stadiums in Yugoslavia[edit]

List of football stadiums in Yugoslavia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We don't need this for the same reason why we don't need List of football stadiums in the Ottoman Empire; there doesn't appear to be a demand for a list of stadiums in countries that no longer exist. The stadiums are adequately covered in the articles for the individual nations so this list is redundant in any case. Spiderone 16:36, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 16:40, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 16:40, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 16:40, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 16:40, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Yugoslavia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 16:40, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 16:40, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 16:40, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 16:40, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Linhart: but this article is misleading. To someone that didn't know better, they would think that these stadiums in this list are actually in a current country called Yugoslavia. The whole point of WP:GNG is that there needs to be evidence of reliable sources covering the subject. You say that no other articles cover this adequately. Well, why does it need to be covered adequately? Spiderone 20:02, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm glad we came to important questions. I think it need to be covered adequately because i think it is about a notable subject. As I said it is about the infrastructure in a globally very strong league (in the most popular sport in that country). If someone thinks it's misledaing I can edit it gladly. Of course I can also provide many sources for numbers in the article if needed.Linhart (talk) 20:11, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So far all you've stated is that you think that the subject is notable. I can't see any evidence for this yet but I'm happy to be proved wrong if evidence does come out. I completely agree with what Wölf below is saying in that the article is incredibly unclear as to which version of Yugoslavia we are even discussing. Spiderone 21:46, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, and so far all you stated is that it's not. For me it is, for the autors of "Encyclopedia of Yugoslav Football" it was, for others it's not.Linhart (talk) 22:31, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The information is from 1991/1992, if you would click on a link in the first sentence of the article, eg Yugoslavia, you would see that it covers a country that existed untill 1992. If you have problem with clarity of that, feel free to discuss there [[1]] (it allready was discussed and that was the consensus). Information about possible stadiums that existed only in Kingdom of Yugoslavia and were demolished before 1991 is not included, because I don't have relevant sources. If someone has them, he/she is free to add them.Linhart (talk) 22:35, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The year should be mentioned in the article. Why is the stadium situation in 1991 notable enough to warrant a standalone article? DaßWölf 22:44, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Because country collapsed in war afterwards. :o The situation was practicely unchanged from 1970s until 1991, any year could be used. Look, I don't really care, do whatever you want...Linhart (talk) 23:13, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.