The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure) per WP:SNOW. The clear consensus is to keep the article, and there is ample precedent provided for doing so (see the category linked below). North of Eden (talk) 19:09, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of foreign Damallsvenskan players[edit]

List of foreign Damallsvenskan players (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rationale for request: The article doesn't appear to meet the WP:GNG and more specifically it doesn't appear to have significant coverage. olowe2011 (talk) 05:16, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:25, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:26, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:26, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:26, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:26, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - It's generally accepted that fully professional leagues warrant such lists, as seen by the contents of this category. Fenix down (talk) 13:27, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Fenix down. GiantSnowman 17:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - football players in the highest league in Sweden is notable.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:13, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Article provides information which is not easily nor widely available in the web, it would be a shame to lose it. 94.210.161.20 (talk) 13:17, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.