- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Kagiso Rabada. While by counting bolded !votes, there is a delete consensus, several of the editors favor deletion note that very limited material might be worth preserving. Given the alternatives to deletion policy, it would be inappropriate to delete, therefore closing as redirect to honor the consensus as appropriately informed by policy. Barkeep49 (talk) 20:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Kagiso Rabada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NLIST which says, "a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources".
Also, note that there was a RfC on this and the consensus on WP:CRIC was to remove these statistics from bios per WP:NOTSTATS. Störm (talk) 07:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:04, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:09, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:09, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Kagiso Rabada (removing details of the batsmen dismissed). No issues with inclusion in the main subject article, per WP:NOTSTATS and WP:SPLIT, and would enhance the content there. International five-wicket hauls are a noteworthy achievement, and by definition, a list of them within the main article has the necessary context and explanation, so does not fail NOTSTATS in this regard. Unfortunately the nom seems to be misrepresenting the consensus of the cited RFC, which closed:
"There's no consensus here that they should universally be included. Nor is there a clear consensus that such sections should be removed from all cricketer articles."
wjematherplease leave a message... 14:20, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with the possibility of some prose being added to the player's article. These sorts of tables need to be supported by prose and considered on an individual basis if they're going to be included on the individual's article. I would rather see a summary added than a table such as this - if this were added it needs to be massively cut down to ensure that it doesn't take over the page, in particular the batter's dismissed and economy rate are really not needed. Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:59, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.