- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. I didn't realize it was currently linked to from the main page. Therefore closing per WP:SKCRIT # 6. (non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:40, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- List of international goals scored by Landon Donovan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is a WP:WIAE. This article is just not WP:NOTE. Rævhuld (talk) 19:35, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Rævhuld: Really? While the list is featured on the Main Page? ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:06, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Speed keep (as creator) per previous discussion, this FL is notable in that Donovan still holds the all-time topscorer record for the United States, a major country in the world of international soccer, and there are multiple reliable sources that refer to his record and this list. Once Clint Dempsey achieves the record, the list will still be notable, as it was a long-running record, and both records have been covered by reliable sources (Washington Post; NY Times; Sports Illustrated). SounderBruce 20:16, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:19, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:19, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep for obvious reasons. Notability clearly established above and I suggest closure per WP:SNOW. YE Pacific Hurricane 20:20, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow Keep The fact that the list made it through FLC and onto the front page means that the list has already proven its notability before.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 20:22, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow keep Per longstanding consensus at WP:FOOTY. S.A. Julio (talk) 20:40, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep since linked from the main page. This is point 6 at WP:SKCRIT. -- John of Reading (talk) 20:58, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It is long established that lists of this nature are deemed notable, and unlikely to have made it through FLC if not a notable topic. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:05, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 21:15, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep - these types of list have been established as notable when the player has held the record for their respective country. Not to mention that it is a FL and made it through that process with no issues. Kosack (talk) 21:26, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep it is important with such lists, the lede makes the argument for the notability and justification for the list. Seems very clear that this is done. Koncorde (talk) 21:46, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep notability established through various references and Wikipedia processes. Hmlarson (talk) 22:00, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. HandsomeFella (talk) 22:02, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy/Snow Keep I support deleting this article on the merits, but not while it's on the front page. An admin should close this now. Power~enwiki (talk) 22:03, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.