The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:29, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

List of members of Cardiff Council by seniority[edit]

List of members of Cardiff Council by seniority (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a list of local politicians ranked by seniority (tellingly, at the time of writing, it has not been updated since the most recent elections in May 2022). The politicians in the list largely fail WP:NPOL, and while established sources (i.e., the council website) do attest to their membership of Cardiff Council, thus meeting WP:LISTPEOPLE, this list of names is also provided by 2022 Cardiff Council election#Ward results, and I fail to see any reason why local politicians should have a separate listing by 'seniority' as well as by alphabetical order of the wards in which they were elected. In summary, I propose that this list is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. (Even if it is, the burden of updating it after changes in council membership is not justified for any usefulness, as evidenced also by there having been no update since the last election eight months ago.) _MB190417_ (talk) 17:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete who seriously cares enough about local politicians by seniority enough to read this, leg alone maintain this? Dronebogus (talk) 20:50, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete Ranking by seniority is not needed for an encyclopedia, especially for local politicians. Belichickoverbrady (talk) 19:01, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
P.S. Of course Wikipedia works by precedent: see WP:OUTCOMES and WP:CCC. An argument otherwise can't be taken seriously. Bearian (talk) 20:16, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.