The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. per G4 as a recreation of the article deleted at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_most_viewed_kpop_music_videos. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 21:45, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of most viewed K-pop music videos[edit]

List of most viewed K-pop music videos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article as it now stands is certainly "different" than the list previously deleted. New entries have been added and the list has grown. The problem, however, is exactly the same as that discussed at Talk:K-pop#RfC:_.22Is_a_most_viewed_list_from_several_sources_acceptable.3F.22: This article is synthesis. We do not have reliable sources stating which songs are #1, 2, 3, etc. SummerPhD^v2.0 12:06, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - as I said on the Talk page, this has gone from top 10 to top 50 to top 1000. Adding new content doesn't make it encyclopedic, it is just WP:INDISCRIMINATE Evaders99 (talk) 20:43, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete per RFC and AFD Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_most_viewed_kpop_music_videos back in 2015. The "new" list doesn't address any of the notability issues, and goes even further into synthesis and original research, counting how many videos made the top 100 and grouping it by company. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:41, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete A clear-cut example of WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Whatever useful info within this list (if any) can be moved to the main K-pop article, if it's not already there. And I'm not inclined to look. freshacconci (✉) 02:59, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete under CSD clause G4 - recreation of an article previously deleted during discussion. Ajf773 (talk) 04:48, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.