The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:47, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of non-fictional lost worlds[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be mainly WP:OR. "Lost world" is not really a scientific term that you can use to classify places. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 21:16, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lost world is strictly fictional. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:01, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:05, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:05, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOR and WP:SYNTH. There is no mention or definition of what a 'fictional lost world' is. Ajf773 (talk) 02:02, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, i think the article creator may have been referring to areas that give rise to Reproductive isolation, that may be reasonable to have a list article about so a rename to something like "List of reproductive isolated locations" could be appropriate? Coolabahapple (talk) 06:21, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TNT. A reasonable list can't be made for anything close to this. Bearian (talk) 00:49, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.