The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of number-one streaming songs of 2017 (South Korea)[edit]

List of number-one streaming songs of 2017 (South Korea) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a superfluous list that simply mirrors the information on the web site. The Gaon Music streaming songs chart does not have its own article page and as the information given is directly copied form their web site as per WP:NOTMIRROR this page is an exemple of what wikipedia is not. Domdeparis (talk) 14:11, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment We may need to consider other articles in this category as well then. --JustBerry (talk) 14:56, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, precisely. It's not going to make sense to just delete this year's iteration, or its just going to be recreated as a natural progression of the way things have been. Sergecross73 msg me 17:23, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I may have opened a can of worms...Domdeparis (talk) 14:58, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Not every chart is notable in its own right and even if it was, that doesn't mean a list of its number ones is either. There would need to be some discussion of what's reaching number one or something that suggests significance of reaching number one on this chart. Fails WP:STANDALONE. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:20, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom's rationale. Cannot see how this passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:34, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.