The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Given that Pizzazz's only contributions ever to Wikipedia have been to repeatedly nominate this article for deletion, this is clearly an attempt to disrupt, rather than to discuss the deletion of an article. Uncle G 20:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of pseudosciences and pseudoscientific concepts[edit]

Reason the page should be deleted. A POVish "unencyclopedia" list. Little or no references to support inclusion. Speedy Delete and salt the Earth. [1] Pizzazz 17:23, 1 February 2007 (UTC)— Pizzazz (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

What? Again? Speedy Keep as another bad faith nom by a single purpose account. Can the closing admin give a warning for this? -- Kesh 17:29, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep - Premature. Under discussion now for how to make it align with WP policy for lists.[2] --Dematt 17:37, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No arguments for deletion given... --RE 18:30, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep and slap an indefinite block on Pizzazz's account. Simões (^talk/_contribs) 18:53, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep No support from voters to delete. The list is POVish though. Assume good faith. Pizzazz 19:00, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep, unquestionably bad faith by SPA that nominated the article yesterday too. Krimpet 20:08, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.