The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 17:21, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Listowel Celtic F.C.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:FOOTYN. This is a club team in an local amateur league with no assertion of significance. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 18:12, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 18:36, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 18:36, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment::- CactusWriter, playing in Premier A division of the Kerry District League is a clear claim of significance. A claim of significance need not amount to a statement that, if sourced, would establish notability. In fact, a claim of significance need not pass any of the general or specialized notability guidelines, such as general notability guideline and WP:NFOOTY. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 19:29, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Wikicology. "Credible claim of significance" is a tricky concept and can be difficult to pin down sometimes, but I disagree with your assessment. The entire Kerry District League is a local amateur club league and therefore teams within it are not inherently notable per longtime consensus at WP:FOOTYN. Notability for an amateur club team in a non-national league requires some credible assertion beyond just being in a league. The page offers no such assertion of significance -- in that, being a member of an amateur league by itself (regardless if the division is called "premier"or anything else) does not assert any significance. Similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spa Road F.C. or Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classic F.C.. (I assume you have read WP:CCOS, but you may wish to review the entire essay, including the two-part test.) — CactusWriter ^(talk) 20:04, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I probably do not have an idea of why you pointed me to an essay I'm very familiar with. That aside, I had said above that "a claim of significance need not amount to a statement that, if sourced, would establish notability". You seemed to be talking about passing WP:NFOOTY meanwhile, a claim of significance need not pass WP:NFOOTY. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 20:38, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The above discussion on the exact semantics of "claim of significance" is irrelevant, because the relevant fact is that this is a local amateur team, with no notability in terms of Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:43, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:NFOOTY. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 17:40, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 14:27, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Current WP:FOOTY consensus is that clubs are notable only if they hagve participated in a national competition per WP:FOOTYN. No indication this club meets that standard, nor any indication of significant, non-routine coverage that would satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 16:15, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.