The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Kent County League. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:41, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Little Sharsted F.C.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Low-level amateur village football team which has never played in a national league or cup competition, the long-established benchmark of notability, additionally no evidence of in-depth coverage in reliable independent sources to get it past the general notability guideline. Article was tagged for lack of notability and having only primary sources, article creator removed these but had only added links to the official site of the league which the club plays in and a very brief match preview on the site of another team in the league, neither of which is independent or showing significant coverage. -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:52, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Kent County League, possible search term but not independently notable. Giant Snowman 18:54, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:08, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:08, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:09, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - just about a plausible search term, but the club are not notable enough for a standalone article per WP:FOOTYN. Fenix down (talk) 13:03, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.