- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 15:28, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Live from Patrick Street (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NALBUM. Should be redirected to Patrick Street/ Karlhard (talk) 20:12, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 20:13, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Karlhard:So, if I understand your reason for imposing an AfD on this article [about an album], you are proposing that it should be re-directed to the existing article on Patrick Street, which is an aticle about the band.
- Please would you explain to me how this makes any sense:
- Why should a new article about an album be re-directed to the article about the band, when the album is already listed in the discography section of the band's article.
- Thank you for your prompt response, and for considering the removal of this article from AfD.
- With kind regards;
- Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk) 20:29, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The album meets criterion number 1 of WP:MUSIC as it has received multiple independent reviews, including Acoustic Guitar magazine (link is to magazine index only), Living Tradition magazine and The Irish Echo. RichardOSmith (talk) 20:39, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There is sufficient independent sources available to prove the notability of the album and album seems to be popular among the locals. more citations should be added to solidify its claim of notability. Nicky mathew (talk) 21:25, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Sufficient coverage to both establish notability and also to allow a meaningful article to exist. --Michig (talk) 21:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I have now added six sources in the External links section, showing evidence that this album was reviewed in issue No. 191 of Folk Roots (fRoots), in addition to the reviews from the Living Tradition, Acoustic Guitar and The Irish Echo that RichardOSmith kindly provided in the first entry above. I have also added the 'Album ratings' template (under the infobox), suitably updated with the scores available from the 'Allmusic' and 'Discogs' websites. I have also added links to online articles and reviews that associate this album with the notoriety of the band.
Retaining this article would enable our encyclopedia to offer a complete series of articles for the entire discography released by these notable musicians, who are deemed "legends of Irish traditional music". Thank you to everyone who supported this article, along with my efforts to make our encyclopedia more complete. With kind regards; Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk) 23:53, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- keep-same reasons as others have said. Wgolf (talk) 01:54, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Improved to the point that Speedy keep may be in order. VMS Mosaic (talk) 06:11, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrawn by nominator - the article is clearly notable. Karlhard (talk) 12:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Please would someone therefore remove the AfD templates from the article itself? Very many thanks once again to everyone who helped so supportively. With kind regards; Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk) 15:17, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.