The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted. I have speedied this on its way as an attack page per CSD G10, particularly given that there were defamatory allegations about living people in it. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:34, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Liverpool the truth[edit]

Liverpool the truth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable trivia points about Liverpool FC. Oscarthecat (talk) 08:11, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: unsourced trivia. Alexius08 (talk) 08:14, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I'd imagine it's already covered in the main Liverpool article (I haven't checked), and this article is full of POV. Lugnuts (talk) 09:00, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:58, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The Liverpool F.C. already has an article, and there is nothing worth merging here. Timmeh!_{(review me)} 14:01, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:05, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nothing not elsewhere before the blanking, other than personal defamation rumour stuff, for which original posting should have been speedied under G10--ClubOranje^T 16:17, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.