The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Shadow Fight 2. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:03, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shadow fight 3[edit]

Shadow fight 3 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable video game, lacks reviews, fails WP:GNG. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 23:57, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - No third party sources to meet the WP:GNG. Sergecross73 msg me 16:51, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:17, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, fails WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 18:46, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Shadow Fight 2. There are a number of release announcements indicating it exists, meaning it is a likely search term, so it meets the bar for a redirect. --Izno (talk) 13:15, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:03, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zibad Rheum[edit]

Zibad Rheum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough context to tell what this article is about. Most of the content pertains to the genus Rheum. Lead suggests it's a particular species endemic to Iran; source at [1] talks about something that Google translates as rhubarb (although if it's a wild species, I suspect it may be Rheum ribes). At any rate, this article seems to be a fork of one of our other Rheum related articles, but I can't tell which one. Plantdrew (talk) 21:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for now. I am unable to find any sources that support the existence of this particular "species" of the genus. I recommend leaving a query on the talk page of the main article and/or the relevant WikiProject - or simply a notification of the AfD on those talk pages ---Steve Quinn (talk) 03:56, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:31, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:31, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - The existence of this plant is not known, as it is not verifiable through reliable sources. Thus, this article should be deleted. RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 16:22, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Euryalus (talk) 07:22, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neelansh Koshta[edit]

Neelansh Koshta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable taekwondo practitioner did not compete at the highest level. Medalling at some obscure off the grid tournament has no effect. The article had been deleted and recreated in various forms previously.PRehse (talk) 12:44, 1 September 2017 (UTC)6[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. PRehse (talk) 13:00, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The coverage is routine sports reporting and his accomplishments do not meet WP:MANOTE or WP:NSPORTS. He is not listed among the 36,000+ fighters at taekwondodata.com and the World Taekwondo Federation doesn't have a men's 70 kg division. As far as his win in a minor tournament's 74 kg division goes, the WTF does recognize that division, but he's not among the 823 competitors ranked by the WTF in that division. He has never competed at a major event. Papaursa (talk) 23:08, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - not sufficient coverage in reliable sources to meet notability under WP:NSPORTS. PohranicniStraze (talk) 17:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete does not meet notability guidelines for martial artists.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 14:28, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

David Barrie[edit]

David Barrie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a self-penned CV of a "social entrepreneur", accompanied by a verbose list of projects that he's allegedly been part of in (often) some vague and unsubstantiated way. I can't find anything of substance about Barrie online. The occasional news article only mentions his name very briefly. Time for it to go, fails WP:GNG. Sionk (talk) 19:54, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:11, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. It appears that the subject is a UK Councillor but fails WP:NPOL. The problem is that there really is little information there out there about him other than passing mentions, like a recent YMCA project in his town. Also doesn't help that most edits to the article were done by: User:Mrdavidbarrie. Jip Orlando (talk) 15:30, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Wikipedia is not Linkedin.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep While he doesn't meet WP:NPOL, he might slide in under WP:DIRECTOR. According to his listing on IMDB, he has 16 director credits, including When Steptoe Met Son, an episode of The Dark Side of Porn, and an episode of Monarchy (TV series), along with several BBC documentaries, some of which sound like they could be notable although they don't have WP articles. PohranicniStraze (talk) 18:13, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. It does read more like a self-penned Linkedin CV rather than an encyclopaedic entry for someone peer-reviewed and widely discussed in independent sources. As it stands, the subject fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:FILMMAKER Pupsbunch (talk) 20:28, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete DPnom. Fails GNG. Only mentions. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:05, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:03, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G. M. Felix[edit]

G. M. Felix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just a regular poet. He hasn't recieved in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR. Greenbörg (talk) 16:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 17:06, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 17:06, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 17:06, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, though he's clearly been on this Earth for a long time and published some stuff, there is no suggestion here he's won awards or had any recognition. If he'd "well known" by his other name Qasir Amritsari, there's zero proof of this online. If there was any hint of pre-internet success I'd hesitate to vote 'delete', but the prognosis doesn't look good here. Sionk (talk) 20:13, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no indication he is actually a notable poet.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:55, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:28, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Hamilton (economist)[edit]

Michael Hamilton (economist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is not established. The only source is not independent of the subject. Does not meet WP:BIO RetiredDuke (talk) 15:45, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. He was a lecturer, not a professor, at the University of Georgia after leaving Kodak. I can't find any independent sources on his role at Kodak, only brief mentions from press announcements. Does not meet academic or business people requirements. StarryGrandma (talk) 18:15, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Sourced by 1 broken link. No prejudice to re-creating if real RS can be found. Agricola44 (talk) 15:47, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete a run of the mill businessman and business professor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:03, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:39, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Iranian Turkic alphabet[edit]

Iranian Turkic alphabet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:CFORK and WP:POVFORK of Azerbaijani alphabet. Every thing is copy-pasted from the Azerbaijani alphabet. the lead, sources, external links and etc. And the name of article is WP:OR, WP:POV, meaningless and unscientific. Turkic is a language family and not a specific language. What is this so-called "Iranian Turkic"? Google it and google brings this wiki page and its copies on other websites. This article should be deleted and if it has any useful content, they should be used on the main article. Wario-Man (talk) 03:35, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per the nominator. Pure bogus. - LouisAragon (talk) 18:29, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:32, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:32, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:33, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:55, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wario-Man said it all. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  22:21, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Seems to be a hoax, with no reliable sources supporting the existence of such an alphabet. RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 02:21, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 03:00, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Nude Pube Banglers[edit]

The Nude Pube Banglers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable band. No reliable sources that give significant coverage and no indication that they've had an impact on their field of music. Also fails general notability guideline. DrStrauss talk 11:08, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:18, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:18, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, an underground band. Geschichte (talk) 08:21, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - What does being an "underground" band to do with anything? Do they meet notability for musical groups or not, is the only question, nothing else. Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:04, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Definetly underground, as they fail the GNG. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:03, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 16:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hollywood Trails[edit]

Hollywood Trails (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It would appear to me that there may well be article subjects that would pass the tests for notability that could be called "Hollywood Trails", perhaps about bicycle or hiking paths in Hollywood (the place in LA) or perhaps one about frequently followed tourism routes in Hollywood (more generally speaking with the meaning the Cinema of the United States.

This article is not about these topics. It is about a business venture called "Hollywood Trails: Eco-Adventure Kewl Bicycle Tours". It was moved to its current title on April 23 2009.

I note that the article was initially created December 6, 2008 as an article about an astrologer.

In its current state, its references - such as they are - are two BlogSpot websites. As self-published sources, they cannot assist the article's claim to have "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

I would argue that this article fails the WP:CORP test. Shirt58 (talk) 10:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Bike tours of Hollywood, Florida, (and 99.9999% of other places) don't generate a lot of media interest. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:04, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails the GNG. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:06, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not notable in current form. jcc (tea and biscuits) 11:04, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:05, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boxifier[edit]

Boxifier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod contested by article creator so here we are. Fails WP:NPRODUCT with no third-party sources given. shoy (reactions) 13:53, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 13:54, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 13:54, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Does not satisfy software notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:26, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

shoy, Boxifier targets a niche, but it is used by people around the world. Here is an article on a reputable blog ^[1] that mentions the fact that this product helps researchers to find cures for neurological disorders - www.goo.gl/1wL5u3. I created this page because Boxifier is a mature product with history and results, not some new entry looking for attention. The reason for creating the page is that it is listed in a comparison table with several other products and it is the only one with a missing page. If you don't feel this should be on Wikipedia, that's fine. I just thought it is helpful, because it is used by so many people each day. (User talk:Andreeaken 08:17, 31 August 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Unfortunately, that's an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument and some of those articles might very well fail WP:NPRODUCT also. Every article has to stand on its own merits by providing in-depth coverage in WP:RS. I would suggest that you could merge the information into the article of the software company, but they don't have an article either. shoy (reactions) 14:24, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would creating an article of the software company in which I could merge this information be flagged as WP:NCOMPANY and the same notability reasons invoked before proposing it for deletion? Ultimately, if this Wikipedia article existing would personally cause you or anyone else trouble then it is just better for it to be deleted. I guess the other articles that clearly fail WP:NPRODUCT were just lucky to not be deleted. (User talk:Andreeaken 31 August 2017 (UTC))

It depends on how notable the company is. Based on what I can find online, they barely have a website, much less coverage in reliable sources. Also, if you feel that other pages fail WP:NPRODUCT, feel free to propose them for deletion. shoy (reactions) 20:28, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails the GNG and it odesn't have the amount of mentions in lists that I personally would prefer to exist. OSE is not policy. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Nancy Ajram. Redirects are cheap.(non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 03:27, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Live at the Jerash Festival 2004[edit]

Live at the Jerash Festival 2004 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth coverage in reliable sources. A redirect to the artist's discography was attempted per WP:ATD. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:46, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:46, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:36, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Besides confirming the its existence, there is no significant discussion of the album in RS. Doesn't meet WP:NALBUM: there is no "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" and therefore there isn't "enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography." —Ojorojo (talk) 15:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Nancy Ajram per ATD. Ojorojo, is there a reason you prefer deletion over a redirect? Thanks,L3X1 (distænt write) 02:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, either is fine. As WBOG noted, redirects are cheap. —Ojorojo (talk) 14:55, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Nancy Ajram discography. Black Kite (talk) 09:28, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

El Dounya Helwa – Live[edit]

El Dounya Helwa – Live (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth coverage in reliable sources. A redirect to the artist's discography was attempted per WP:ATD. Current sourcing us user-generated. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:41, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:37, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Same as Live at the Jerash Festival 2004 article – besides confirming the its existence, there is no significant discussion of the album in RS. Doesn't meet WP:NALBUM: there is no "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" and therefore there isn't "enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography." — Ojorojo (talk) 15:50, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete doesn't meet Wp:NALBUM. jcc (tea and biscuits) 11:05, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Nancy Ajram per other discussion. L3X1 (distænt write) 21:38, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Nancy Ajram videography. Redirects are cheap. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 03:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Best of Nancy Clips[edit]

The Best of Nancy Clips (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth coverage in reliable sources. A redirect to the artist's discography was attempted per WP:ATD. Current sourcing us user-generated. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:37, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Nancy Ajram Nancy Ajram videography. A valid search term per WP:ATD-R. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:58, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I personally think that it would be better to redirect this page to Nancy Ajram videography. Could you please reevaluate where you want this targeted to? RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 18:38, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Modified my !vote. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:11, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Nancy Ajram videography, as this seems to be one album in her videography. It should not be kept because it is not notable, with no real outside references from reliable sources that are significant. RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 18:37, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Same as the live albums – besides confirming the its existence, there is no significant discussion of the album in RS. Doesn't meet WP:NALBUM: there is no "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" and therefore there isn't "enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography." —Ojorojo (talk) 15:53, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:03, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Awel Mara[edit]

Awel Mara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth coverage in reliable sources. A redirect to the artist's discography was attempted per WP:ATD. Current sourcing us user-generated. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:37, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - this doesn't pass WP:NALBUM. Maybe it can be added as a section in the article of the singer. KagunduTalk To Me 09:08, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not notable album.122.171.237.5 (talk) 05:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Besides confirming the its existence, there is no significant discussion of the album in RS. Doesn't meet WP:NALBUM: there is no "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" and therefore there isn't "enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography." —Ojorojo (talk) 15:56, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Nancy Ajram. The redirection may be re-evaluated if reliable sources in Arabic are forthcoming. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Ajram: Greatest Hits[edit]

Nancy Ajram: Greatest Hits (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth coverage in reliable sources. A redirect to the artist's discography was attempted per WP:ATD. Current sourcing us user-generated. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Nancy Ajram is one of the most well known singers in the Arab world. She has an international audience, similar to many kpop groups today. I would like to search for more sources. If this is an official greatest hits album, I am pretty sure there will be sources in Arabic.--DreamLinker (talk) 11:05, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Any help is appreciated. I used to listen to many of these songs and I am pretty sure it is a notable album. Unfortunately I cannot read Arabic.--DreamLinker (talk) 11:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – Although she is very popular, her albums haven't received much written commentary – besides confirming the its existence, there is no significant discussion of the album in RS. Doesn't meet WP:NALBUM: there is no "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" and therefore there isn't "enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography." —Ojorojo (talk) 16:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to her per other discussions. z'L3X1 (distænt write) 23:00, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Let's try to sort this out using regular editing, which may include merging, and if not, we can revisit the possibility of deletion at a later time. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  08:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bardon Park (Western Australia)[edit]

Bardon Park (Western Australia) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable park. Sure there's information on it but no actual proof of notability. Wikipedia:Existence does not prove notability etc. — IVORK _Discuss 13:08, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I searched but could find no references suggesting that this is a recognized tourist attraction or otherwise more than an attractive but run of the mill city park in the Maylands neighborhood of Perth's Bayswater suburb. It's not even mentioned in our articles about Maylands and Bayswater, although some other parks are. As such, notability is not established under the guideline at WP:NGEO or otherwise. (Note: there's a more notable Bardon Park in Leicestershire.) --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:29, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 02:05, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Community group https://www.facebook.com/bardonpark/ User:stevenebsary —Preceding undated comment added 06:30, 29 August 2017 (UTC) As the Bardon Park area is significant to Noongar Culture and history with the natural springs in the wetlands also its links to Derbarl Yerrigan (Swan River) http://www.bom.gov.au/iwk/calendars/nyoongar.shtml#djilba[reply]

Indigenous art installation https://facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=692968497568450&id=677400495791917

Tourist attraction park playground https://www.weekendnotes.com/bardon-park/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevenebsary (talk • contribs) 08:11, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Very reluctantly. There just does not seem to be anywhere near enough to establish notability at this time. It is mentioned in WA Parliamentary debate though. As much as I do not like to see the first article by a WP:NEWBIE get deleted, especially given that there seems to be so much good faith here, and having had such trouble myself when I first started, there just does not seem to be enough here for anything remotely core or in-depth or specific to the park. If the indigenous aspect can be built up, I might be convinced to change my mind. Aoziwe (talk) 12:20, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How is the sv site version related here? This all started due to facebooks import from that source, causing incorrect data there for the place (well in the wrong language). Unfortunately facebook is terrible at places in many ways. Will that version still exist? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevenebsary (talk • contribs) 13:21, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined not to encroach into foreign language Wikipedias. From what I can tell with the assistance of a translator extension, that article was created by an automated bot. Being that was the case, and no such thing for article creation exists on the English Wikipedia, what I know of their guidelines clearly isn't enough for me to propose deletion. Most foreign language Wikipedias act independently of one another, as even the guidelines after all are all just one big agreed-upon consensus between editors. I am not familiar with the history of that article or the bot that seemingly created it. — IVORK _Discuss 14:04, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Note. The Swedish Wikipedia article mentioned above is at sv:Bardon Park (park i Australien, Western Australia). The same bot that created that article also created one for sv:Bardon Park (park i Australien, New South Wales). That's a real neighborhood park in Coogee, New South Wales [2], but I don't see anything in either of these Swedish articles that suggests that either of these parks is notable under English Wikipedia standards. --Arxiloxos (talk) 15:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into Maylands, Western Australia. There's really no need to delete all of this newbie's work.--Pontificalibus (talk) 09:43, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep for now, to revisit in six months or one year. Or at worst merge, possibly into Maylands, Western Australia. Or move to List of parks in Western Australia and develop. Quite small municipal/urban parks in the United States are "Kept" at AFD fairly frequently. Coverage of parks in Western Australia could be developed by creating a list-article, with a table row for each one. I note there is not a List of parks in Australia (currently a redlink) or even an international List of parks (currently a redlink), though there is a List of national parks and List of national parks in Australia. --doncram 17:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note there are sources about community involvement in the park, from relatively local news sources and blogs, but I think these add up and suffice. For example:

• blog review/description of the park
• I added that "Nearby residents concerned about the park incorporated the Bardon Park Riverside Restoration Group to address weeds in 2016. The park has been managed by the City of Bayswater since 2006." based on |title=Residents to tackle Bardon Park weeds themselves, of 11 October 2016
• I added that: "A nature playground was developed for $175,000 and opened in March 2016. The playground features a rock garden which illustrates 'the six Noongar seasons of Birak - the first summer, Bunuru - the second summer, Djeran - autumn, Makuru - the first rains, Djilba - the second rains and Kambarang - flowering.'", based on the City of Bayswater's facebook posting about it: [3].

I think this stuff adds up. What is needed is some helpful development, not eradication of good faith new contributor's work. --doncram 17:26, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. we have normally kept all substantial city parks as geographic features, and the references are good enough for that. DGG ( talk ) 00:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, meets WP:GNG, re sources discussed throughout this afd, a "Parks" section in the Maylands, Western Australia article would also be useful. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:12, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete, I'm not sure that this is a "substantial city park", to quote DDG. If this were Central Park or Hyde Park then definitely, but I'm not convinced this is anything more than an ordinary suburban park, and none of the sources shown or arguments presented have convinced me otherwise. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 22:17, 22 September 2017 (UTC).[reply]
• Weak keep - This seems to have been covered in multiple reliable sources. Although there aren't too many, I think that there are enough to verify the contents of the article. RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 20:06, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete just a small city park with no indication of notability. I was easily convinced by reading this from one of the sources in the article: "would have to be one of the prettiest, albeit least-known of our riverside parklands. Relatively small in size, ..." It has some grass, a playground, some picnic tables (as do thousands of others). Just a WP:MILL park. MB 02:42, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep not sure this strictly meets GNG, but normally with geographical features we just need their existence to be proven, which in this article it has. jcc (tea and biscuits) 11:06, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:14, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diablogato[edit]

Diablogato (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable band, but the article does assert the importance or significance of the subject, so no (A7). I find 30 ghits, most not even related to the band, offering no significant coverage whatsoever; a few mentions here and there is all I can find. The two sources are unconvincing, as mere announcements. Mduvekot (talk) 22:11, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - The band doesn't pass our notability criteria for music, as there are not enough reliable sources that discuss this band for at least a paragraph ([4] is an exception). RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 22:28, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:24, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:24, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Just mentions. Fails GNG. L3X1 (distænt write) 23:07, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Erik Zachary[edit]

Erik Zachary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A bit too soon. Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO and WP:ENT. Trivial mention in the sources cited, except for here (a local entertainment publication) and here (an industry publication which looks like a press release). A Google search brought back the same sources and the same trivial mention. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:10, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a non-notable broadcast personality.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:50, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails WP:GNG. -- Dane ^talk 01:17, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - nothing notable. --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 06:13, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Krishna Subramanian (COO Komprise)[edit]

Krishna Subramanian (COO Komprise) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet WP:NBIO. Sources are either blogs/user generated content (Forbes link), social networks or press releases, that do not support the claims in the article. I am unable to find any significant coverage of the subject of the article, however there are plenty of articles about Krishna Subramanian, a technological entrepreneur of the same name (but different gender, so definitely not the same person). PGWG (talk) 21:48, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I nominated the article on the firm for AfD, but missed this one. Neither he nor the firm have any indication of notability, and the simultaneous creation of the articles is good evidence that the contributor was an undeclared paid editor DGG ( talk ) 04:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:55, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Effectively a CV page by a probably connected contributor. A sequence of jobs is described, and some in-role mentions relative to her current and a former company can be found, but nothing to indicate that the subject is of encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 06:55, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete glorified CV, doesn't meet WP:GNG. jcc (tea and biscuits) 13:26, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Video Clips 2[edit]

Video Clips 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth coverage in reliable sources. A redirect to the artist's discography was attempted per WP:ATD. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:31, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, no references and barely any content. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  08:43, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – Although she is very popular, her albums haven't received much written commentary – besides confirming the its existence, there is no significant discussion of the album in RS. Doesn't meet WP:NALBUM: there is no "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" and therefore there isn't "enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography." —Ojorojo (talk) 16:06, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR applies. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 03:30, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Who (film)[edit]

Who (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See film notability guidelines. Unreleased films are only notable if production is notable, and this article does not indicate anything about production other than that it has started. Because production is not notable, the list is promotional. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The release date as stated is December 6. So, it's informational rather than promotional. Dynamic80 (talk) 04:35, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:15, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:15, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alts:

WP:INDAFD: Ajay Devaloka Shine Tom Chacko Shruthy Menon

• Keep per a project which has begun filming and is receiving coverage to meet WP:NFF. IE: Times of India is in-depth SIGCOV. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 22:30, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gregory Magie[edit]

Gregory Magie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Checking source & related sites shows nothing special. JamesG5 (talk) 02:49, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:39, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - 33 G-hits for NAME + "composer" for this music professor and director. Let's call this one WP:TOOSOON. Carrite (talk) 01:29, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete conducting non-notable organizations, so he is not notable for conducting. Composing is also not at a notable level.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:13, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:05, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shamsun Nahar Khan[edit]

Shamsun Nahar Khan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An associate professor of pharmaceutical science, whose name is on 35+ journal articles, although never as lead author. The most cited of those articles, according to Google Scholar, has been cited 72 times. Four have been cited at least 35 times each. In some fields that would be excellent, but is modest, I believe, for pharmaceutical chemistry. It's an order of magnitude below the citation figures for the lead authors on some of those articles, such as Atta-ur-Rahman (chemist)[5] and Muhammad Iqbal Choudhary[6]. Her list of scholarships, fellowships, and awards is better than none, but not highly prestigious.

The cited sources are the university where she teaches and a blog self-published by a third party (so not a reliable source for facts about her), plus two sources that appear irrelevant - they don't mention her. A relatively junior academic, who at this time does not meet WP:GNG or WP:PROF. Worldbruce (talk) 21:37, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 21:38, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 21:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 21:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Fails WP:GNG.  FITINDIA  03:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - does not pass WP:GNG. Altaf (talk) 09:01, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 14:28, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gettingtough – The Race[edit]

Gettingtough – The Race (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources and probably fails on WP:GNG Shaded0 (talk) 18:10, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete can't find GNG-meeting coverage, reads like a business listing. jcc (tea and biscuits) 11:07, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:05, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Team Uttejit[edit]

Team Uttejit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable racing team. I haven't managed to find any reliable third-party sources using Google. –barakokula31 (talk) 17:53, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, a university club or society that certainly doesn't meet the WP:GNG requirements. Ajf773 (talk) 21:58, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: The single listing from a contest does not demonstrate encyclopaedic notability for this society, nor are searches, including Indian media searches, finding anything better. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 07:35, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Despite L3X1's mistaken impression that canoes are rowed (they're paddled), there's clear consensus to delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:38, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Shaw (canoeist)[edit]

Jonathan Shaw (canoeist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:AUTOBIO; no coverage beyond a couple of articles from local papers and race placements. Not enough for WP:SPORTBASIC. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:16, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:21, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:21, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - this is a brief article about a canoeist who retired in 2012. The article appears to have been created by the canoeist himself. Vorbee (talk) 14:56, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non notable boat rower. z'L3X1 (distænt write) 23:08, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teodore Acosta[edit]

Teodore Acosta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Fails the general and subject-specific notability criteria. — Zawl 16:59, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 18:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 18:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 18:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:30, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:30, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nom. None of his works appear notable. power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:30, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete GNG, I found sources instead on a Spanish mayor and an Arizona DUI convict. L3X1 (distænt write) 23:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:26, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

EPIDSM Locrian[edit]

EPIDSM Locrian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

see - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Roxy the dog. bark 16:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:25, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

EPIDSM Phrygian[edit]

EPIDSM Phrygian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

see - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Roxy the dog. bark 16:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:23, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

EPIDSM Dorian[edit]

EPIDSM Dorian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

see - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Roxy the dog. bark 16:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:35, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:26, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

EPIDSM Aeolian[edit]

EPIDSM Aeolian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

see - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Roxy the dog. bark 16:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:34, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:25, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

EPIDSM Lydian[edit]

EPIDSM Lydian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

see -Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Roxy the dog. bark 16:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:25, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

EPIDSM Mixolydian[edit]

EPIDSM Mixolydian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

see - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Roxy the dog. bark 16:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:32, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expanded Ptolemy's Intense Diatonic Scale to Modes Power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:05, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nausch Hogan & Murray[edit]

Nausch Hogan & Murray (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:56, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - it appears that this article does not include any significant sources or coverage from third-parties (in addition, most of the external links provided in the article appear to be broken). In my opinion, this article does not meet Wikipedia's general notability requirements. Name goes here (talk | contribs) 03:12, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I am unable to find coverage to show that this meets WP:GNG or WP:COMPANY.  gongshow  talk  08:56, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to In Death. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 03:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eve Dallas[edit]

Eve Dallas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article covers a non-notable fictional character. There does not appear to be enough coverage on this character from reliable, third-party sources to justify the character having her own article. While doing a search for resources, all I could find were blogs discussing the characters and promotional information on the novels. All of the information about this character could be covered in the article on the parent series (in Death). Aoba47 (talk) 15:35, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Aoba47 (talk) 15:35, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.Aoba47 (talk) 15:35, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.Aoba47 (talk) 15:35, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:45, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to in Death. No indication of separate notability for this character, so the main article is the place she should be covered. --RL0919 (talk) 13:48, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for your comment. Aoba47 (talk) 18:25, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 13:13, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Godiva (band)[edit]

Godiva (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(...and by implication Godiva (album) and the redirect at Call Me Under 666)

This is a follow up to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cryonic Temple, and is a pretty similar situation, but it gets complicated, so bear with me.

First, there's about two dozen notable things that share the name. So you end up with a search that looks something like this, until you narrow it down to basically nothing as far as news goes. If you switch to open web searches you get some apparent churnalism, passing mention, and very niche promotional interviews, with quaint plugs to remind you to check out their myspace page. And that's really the best of it in a search that pretty quickly wanders off into other topics.

None of the members appear to be independently notable. At first glance, it looks like they're sideways connected to other things that might be, but it's basically a giant almost entirely unreferenced walled garden, including their album, their label, their other label, and their producer.

It's possible that these are not actually overtly promotional, and just made by an over eager fan, but if a few of these go to the bin, probably looking toward a larger AfD at some point. Maybe there's something in German that I'm missing, but there's no article on de.wiki, so that doesn't make me hopeful. TJW^talk 12:58, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 13:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 13:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 13:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 13:13, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Scenario II (band)[edit]

Scenario II (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC, as I can't find any reliable references to support what is being said. RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 12:51, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 12:57, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 12:57, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 12:57, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - No reliable sources providing in-depth coverage, and so does not meet musical notability or general notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:57, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:NMUSIC. jcc (tea and biscuits) 11:07, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per the recent precedent in similar AfDs and the WP:CIL issue, participation here suggests that both are important. —SpacemanSpiff 13:47, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indian medical college rankings, 2015[edit]

Indian medical college rankings, 2015 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Indian engineering college rankings, 2014 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indian engineering college rankings, 2015 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

There are several issues with these lists. First, there is an issue of copyright in list in quoting an entire list. Second, they are misleading in that none of them is complete, and institutes are arbitrarily included or excluded. The same applies to ratings. Third, the lists are outdated and as such serve very little purpose. As a matter of fact, practically none of them are the targets of other articles. Muhandes (talk) 11:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all for the same reasons as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Indian University Rankings and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Indian law school rankings. These articles are poorly sourced and act are more than enrolment guide rather than an encyclopedia as per WP:NOT Ajf773 (talk) 07:25, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 13:13, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blue marble (musician)[edit]

Blue marble (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable musician. Article claims a lot of things, but nothing could be corroborated. I couldnt find reliable sources. The subject fails WP:MUSICBIO. No sources as of the nomination date since creation.

Possibly an autobiography (artist name: Matthias; username: Mattix30), subjects date of birth is 30. An article by the same user, "Marble recordings" was speedily deleted. This article might have been previously created by other name. —usernamekiran(talk) 10:30, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: For reasons given above, just wanted to note that of the sources added since the nomination only one appears to not be self-created (the "Fuzz Magazine Article"), and that appears to be a blog post. The mention of Matthias De Herdt is also a trivial mention of his previous work as part of a duo among a discussion of several other artists. GiovanniSidwell (talk) 14:31, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 12:07, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 12:07, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 12:07, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mandingo (band)[edit]

Mandingo (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MUSICBIO. No significant coverage, not signed to a major record label, cannot find any indication of their albums receiving awards or charting. PGWG (talk) 21:26, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete- non notable band, fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO--XFhumu^Talk 11:18, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:SIGCOV.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:21, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Band fails the GNG. L3X1 (distænt write) 23:12, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:05, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Valley Rose Golf Course[edit]

Valley Rose Golf Course (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable golf course. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:35, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non-notable former gulf course (how have I come to be typing this?) which fails WP:MILL and WP:CORPDEPTH.--SamHolt6 (talk) 21:52, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - although there is one article that seems to be discussing this topic indepth ([7]), the article is infact routine news about the foreclosure of the course. I could not find any other information that is indepth and from a reliable source about this golf course. Thus, it should be deleted for not being verifiable. RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 22:44, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:05, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tara Layne[edit]

Tara Layne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actress of questionable notability-also contrary to how it sounds in the article, she herself didn't win a award, but the short film she was in did. Wgolf (talk) 22:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:05, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:05, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:46, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I tried searches for "Tara Siegel" as well as "Tara Layne", and was unable to find evidence to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR at this time.  gongshow  talk  23:40, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - The content of the article cannot be supported be reliable sources. In a quick search, I did not find any in-depth coverage of this actress. Thus, the article, due to how it is not able to be verified, should be deleted. RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 19:40, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NEO Connect[edit]

NEO Connect (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable product of a non-notable company. References are PR. No in-depth coverage in independent sources. Pontificalibus (talk) 15:35, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Pontificalibus (talk) 15:58, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:22, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Disagree with the proposed deletion. Article can be improved with further citations from independent sources, or alternatively should be merged with NEO Exchange which has more notability. --CorSter (talk) 04:32, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I nominated the article was because I couldn't find further citations from independent sources. If you know of any please do add them. I would oppose a merger with NEO Exchange because this product has nothing to do with NEO Exchange, other than being created by the same company.--Pontificalibus (talk) 14:37, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]