- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:49, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Lonestar Soccer Club[edit]
- Lonestar Soccer Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable club. Not a professional team and does not meet WP:GNG. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:34, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete Holds training camps with clubs like Manchester United and AS Roma, and is obviously prestigious, but not really enough to push through WP:GNG. If someone could provide a list of players who played for the club and are now Tier-1 footballers who play in pro leagues and the list is substantual, it could pass in a similar way to Senrab F.C., but i can't even find one notable footballer who had association with the club. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnTombs48 (talk • contribs) 18:21, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:52, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:52, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:52, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. — Yellow Dingo (talk) 05:59, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 07:08, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - doesn't appear to have any coverage from independent reliable sources Spiderone 20:50, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.