The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 23:38, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LookTracker[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Business promotion. This is essentially an advertorial, using general information on the technique to support an article on a particular company. DGG ( talk ) 23:12, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:39, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:39, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:39, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Although if Teknicks is notable, maybe it could be mentioned there? Multiple searches found nothing significant and notable here, here, here, here and here (some of the first results in the first search are primary). The article is neat and sourced but not notable at this time. SwisterTwister talk 20:07, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources cited are about the technology, not this company. Fails WP:GNG. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:44, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Regardless of notability, most of the current article is unsourced and the sources that are on the page are junk sources. Even if they were notable, everything on the current article would warrant deletion. CorporateM (Talk) 16:34, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not for it being promotional, which it is, as articles can always be editing. However, there simply are not any sources that support notability. Without them, WP:GNG isn't satisfied.--TTTommy111 (talk) 05:04, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and references are more general about the technology and not specific to the company. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:04, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Fails WP:GNG. Winner 42 Talk to me! 20:30, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.