The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was lost - delete. Mailer Diablo 02:54, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lostpedia[edit]

Clearly an advertisement. The user who created this page only has Lostpedia related contributions. The website does not meet anything on WP:WEB. Jtrost (^T | C | _#) 00:24, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as no notability asserted. Aplomado - U T C 00:26, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:WEB ,WP:SPAM and WP:NOT. Royboy crashfan 01:14, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not only advertising, but nn. Ten unique Google hits. --Hyperbole 01:45, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

10? Try 21,000 unique Google hits. 156,000 total. 67.180.162.75 20:28, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment What about an external link at Lost (TV Series)? Danny Lilithborne 03:12, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
To me, that sounds appropriate. But the place to discuss that is Talk:Lost_(TV_series). Of course, there's no reason not to be bold, make the edit, and see what others think. --Hyperbole 06:56, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lost (TV series) does not link to any fansites because there are too many of them. If we allow one then the next thing you know there will be dozens. Jtrost (^T | C | _#) 12:38, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I tend to think a Wiki and a fansite have different values as an external link; where a personal website proclaiming that Lost is sooo cool is not worthy of an external link, a popular wiki with numerous active editors and a wealth of information probably would be. --Hyperbole 15:51, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Lostpedia receives 200,000+ hits/day, has over 156,000 Google references, grows at ~20% per week. Go ahead and delete it from the wikipedia, but it is one of the most popular Lost related sites on the Internet. 67.180.162.75 20:28, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete completely nn. Sheehan (Talk) 03:17, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nn and advertisement. Metamagician3000 03:33, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, should be a link. Lundse 10:14, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nn, ad. --Terence Ong 11:06, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Lose this spam. Just zis Guy you know? 11:14, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - spam. Lankiveil 12:47, 12 April 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Delete though I will say I personally would not be opposed to a simple external link off the main Lost page.--Isotope23 16:11, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - Yes let us lose this piece of useless information Aeon 18:06, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this page, but a link from the main Lost (TV series) page would be appropriate. Homestar Runner has a link to hrwiki.org, for example. --E lkman - ^(talk) 19:06, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Royboycrash Admrb♉ltz ( T | I | E ) 21:36, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, should be a link --Mason 22:26, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Spam Funky Monkey 00:35, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the spam. -- Scientizzle 21:43, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Oh my god, this is the same as the Lost Wiki] article which has also been listed under AfD. Freddie 02:00, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
take it off. I had to check out the site to see if it had some good info, I have seen much better!--muhaidib-- (^Talk | _#info | ) 05:32, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have seen better? Where? Lostpedia is by far the most complete Lost resource on the internet. 67.180.162.75 20:28, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.