The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:25, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Louis Espenschied[edit]

Louis Espenschied (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person, fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG Joseph2302 (talk) 22:21, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete A family history project which fails WP:GNG Theroadislong (talk) 22:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 23:31, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 23:31, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The wagon company might be notable, but he isn't. Indeed in an article about "Louis Espenschied" there are hardly more than three sentences about the actual "Louis Espenschied". JohnInDC (talk) 18:49, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. non notable, duplicates the other parts of the family history project. DGG ( talk ) 21:31, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.