The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:48, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Louis Williams (architect)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Single source for supporting notability valereee (talk) 19:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This article needs love, but this search in the online archive of Australian newspapers bears out his prominence in eclesiastical architecture in his time - church after church, many of them major. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:55, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Yes, seems to have been a pretty notable architect with a string of notable buildings to his credit. The reason given by the nominator isn't really sufficient for deletion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:00, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.