The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 07:14, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lucas Perri[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Footballer who fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Article has been deleted twice in the past. PROD and BLPPROD have been contested. Spike 'em (talk) 10:40, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

also there is a more extensive Draft:Lucas Perri which was rejected for move into main space on 28th Jan. Spike 'em (talk) 10:44, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 10:46, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 10:46, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 10:46, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 10:46, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Nzd (talk) 11:47, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nomination ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 11:25, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The draft is much better and can be used once the player makes an appearance in a professional match. Nzd (talk) 11:47, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 12:22, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As above: use pre-existing draft when notability attained. Eagleash (talk) 17:11, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with the users above, the player is not notable enough for a standalone page right now, but the draft can be used in the future if the player becomes notable. Garlicolive (talk) 17:33, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. AmericanAir88^(talk) 00:05, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.