The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of♥♦♣ ♠ 03:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this website. Joe Chill (talk) 20:53, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Plus it seems to be self-promotional. Search engines results don't qualify an inclusion in Wikipedia. --Scieberking (talk) 23:41, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Just promotional. Niteshift36 (talk) 18:51, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.