The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:53, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Luxion[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails WP: CORP with no assertion of notability, plus no coverage in independent, 3rd party, reliable sources. I have performed WP: BEFORE and cannot find any reliable sources on it from a Google search. Electric Catfish 21:07, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This user requested to be confirmed at WP: PERM/C here in order to add information about the company he works for. I commented that he has a COI. This may be a promotion of the company he works for. Electric Catfish 21:11, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Hi, I am new to creating Wikipedia pages and am making sure to stay within the guidelines. I will be citing references as the company is notable in the 3d rendering and computer graphics industry. I have started updating already. Josh Mings (talk) 02:12, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:51, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:52, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I see no indication that this company is notable per WP:NCORP. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 15:31, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 20:51, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:51, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No evidence of notability, nor independent sources, proffered. Article creator isn't merely a COI issue, but apparently an SPA, not having been heard from since commenting here a week and a half ago. Ravenswing 08:14, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.